"Simple" is too qualitative because it suggests the implementation is
simple.
To me good performance and undo are the most basic of features and we still
have a lot of room to improve on them.
As far as the small nuances that we can tweak, we're actively working on
those as the bug reports come in.
For example: Drag + drop of soundfonts, VSTs, project files, automation
controls. Those are relatively simple and good goals.
What you are describing (deleting a range selection) should be tested on
master (as Amadeus mentioned) and if it doesn't work to your needs, file a
bug.
We have a lot of email topics which pick on a specific feature (which is
fine) but to fix them properly, we really need to track them as bugs or
enhancements, etc or else they are a needle in a haystack of email
archives. :)
-Tres
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
