@Amadeus Folego, implementation should be discussed, but a cascade transversing of relevant datastructures with deletion. The *big* issue here are dependencies, where deletion of one object could lead to either memory-leaks form an other, or plainout crash..
but @tresf 'simple' is in context of usage only. This discussion should not focus code complexity at all. I hoped that all (or at least some..) here would take notis of the least /functional /features, when they used the software, and then add those to the discussion. - Eg an 'in-house' /usage-survey/ -aka /use-case/ (i did an hour of that with a family member, who never had seen a DAW before, and posted that case here about ½ year ago, that really led to nothing -Sad, really -Because use-cases are among the most valuable tool in software dev) -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/which-simple-features-are-least-impressive-tp11504p11507.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
