not sure if this is relevant. It depends on how much work has been done to accomendate more vst-formats already?? But.. What if lmms did not save the vst-controllers, eg -that pesty binary-string in the vst-block, that all too often bloats to absurd size, and is unuseable for lmms, at re-open, but instead saved the lmms-contollers, eg: <http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/file/n11588/Synth1_dial_array.png>
Those controllers are native to lmms, and should always be possible to save -right? Then the various ways vst's are builded, would be transparent in respect to how lmms saved data in the mmp, and the bin-string could be omitted Is this silly..? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/a-silly-thought-in-context-of-vst-usage-tp11588.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
