I didn't even knew there was a survey.
Is it still on or am I too late?


Best,

Diego Rodrigues

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Stian Jørgensrud <stian...@gmail.com> wrote:
You can see some autogenerated graphics and view most of the results here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1N9gdp2J74ep_VcOiQMcWicHRpr0lcDhEzY45NtwxBmc/viewanalytics

And all the answers are here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fPWTO34b_mgHLVJjahRxlXTXGOP3dWbObwNKwaljnjE/edit?usp=sharing


It is extremely interesting to view the answers, so you should analyze it a
bit for yourself. Much more fun than reading the following.
I am going to analyze just a tiny bit now :)
* Surprising that half of the users have used LMMS for 2 years or more. Or
maybe those who used LMMS just for months didn't answer...

* Strange that controllers and the FX mixer are considered easier to learn
than the Automation Editor (?)

* According to the users the best with LMMS is active development, easy to use and out of the box. And obviously free and opensource. (Read all answers
in the links)

* Somewhat frightening that 24% says they never solved the problem they had
with LMMS

* Answer from one user when asked how he solved the problem: "I reported it and it was fixed in less than 2 days ... most impressed". Not common, I
guess :p

* Apart from not knowing about LMMS on G+, YT and SC, which for YT and SC are natural as they recently was created, the LSP is the site most people
haven't heard about!!! What??

* 10% don't follow LMMS on G+ or Facebook. More than expected.

* (The questions for Facebook, but mostly G+ isn't as accurate as they could
be because of human error, sorry)

* Almost everyone got a 64 bit computer!

* (The questions about RAM and cores in the CPU shows that most users aren't
that techincal savvy or didn't bother answer)

* LMMS is not considered good for mastering (not used by many people for
that). A bit surprising (?)

* Suprising that most people makes music just for themselves (I thought that
meant not share it with others). Could be that the purpose is for
themselves, but they still publishes to social media.



--
View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Survey-results-tp11591.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to