Tres Finocchiaro wrote >> >> I think the download numbers are lying more than the survey, > > > How exactly? Do you think there is a 32-bit troll that keeps clicking on > it for fun? What do you mean by this statement?
Sorry, realized that I should explained more after sending the mail. That the downloads didn't tell how many 64 bit machines and OS'es the userbase consists of. Many just use 32 bit because they are used to it (and maybe experience less bugs), even though they are capable of running LMMs 64 bit. You are completely correct that the real question should be what LMMS type they are running. I didn't think so much about it when I snagged it from Dave's proposal questions. We can do better next time ;) And hopefully more people than me (and maybe Uros) can check the survey on beforehand then! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Survey-results-tp11591p11606.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
