I take it you missed this bit
https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/26038054/
https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/32369643/
https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/28622501/
https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/31284585/
[image: Inline image 2][image: Inline image 1]
[image: Inline image 3]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193779/6e65eece-
c1fb-11e6-81c9-096676a0d414.PNG
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193780/6e66e0b8-
c1fb-11e6-9b4b-b83d24419512.PNG
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193779/6e65eece-
c1fb-11e6-81c9-096676a0d414.PNG
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aaaaaand, just for good measure
>> https://lmms.io/forum/viewtopic.php?t=857
>
>
> That whole conversation is speculative and unspecific.
>
> If the OP had asked something specific...
>
> - "Can I use LMMS samples to create a track in another DAW" the answer
> is yes, royalty free.
>
> If the OP had asked something like
>
> - "Are the samples bundled with LMMS CC0? Can I take attribution and
> call them my own?" The answer is no. The samples as a whole were never
> officially released CC0.
>
> Please stop supporting a dumb argument by linking dumb questions. If you
> want to fix the samples library, just do it and shut up. The discussion
> can live in the multiple threads we already have for this type of
> discussion.
>
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Mayo Staccato <daquisit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Aaaaaand, just for good measure
>> https://lmms.io/forum/viewtopic.php?t=857
>> In related news, I've found a few made-from scratch sample packs in the
>> mailing list archives.... so I unquit.
>> peace
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Mayo Staccato <daquisit...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Any suspicion of violations of built-in samples today was a witch hunt
>>> you started, so this email is superfluous to the project"
>>> Yes, nobody has ever suspected anything about the sample library or
>>> questioned the licensing. I'm sorry
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/26038054/
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/32369643/
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/28622501/
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/31284585/
>>> [image: Inline image 2][image: Inline image 1]
>>> [image: Inline image 3]
>>> https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193779
>>> /6e65eece-c1fb-11e6-81c9-096676a0d414.PNG
>>> https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193780
>>> /6e66e0b8-c1fb-11e6-9b4b-b83d24419512.PNG
>>> https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21193779
>>> /6e65eece-c1fb-11e6-81c9-096676a0d414.PNG
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Tres Finocchiaro <
>>> tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mayo, Sir whatever...
>>>>
>>>> No one accused the built-in library of infringement except you.
>>>>
>>>> Rather, it was our new library we were constructing -- spearheaded at
>>>> that time by someone under the alias of "HDD" whom obtained samples under
>>>> false pretence. HDD had made the promise to offer accreditation in our
>>>> library while also asking for CC0.
>>>>
>>>> This is documented here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/LMMS/samples/issues/15
>>>>
>>>> Any suspicion of violations of built-in samples today was a witch hunt
>>>> you started, so this email is superfluous to the project.
>>>>
>>>> Since you've stated you're no longer working on this
>>>> <https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/3139>, the rest of the team will
>>>> focus on this as time permits.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Mayo Staccato <daquisit...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello all. SIrBothersome here. As some of you probably know, over the
>>>>> course of the years, the native LMMS sample library has been accused on
>>>>> multiple occasions of copyright violation/improper licensing, or something
>>>>> to that effect. Well, last night, looking through LMMS legacy repos, I
>>>>> made
>>>>> an important discovery. Our current library appears to have been first
>>>>> implemented in version 0.09, though without the .ds files and a few of the
>>>>> .oggs. A good portion of them still appear though. In the "authors" file,
>>>>> one Sebastian Tilsch
>>>>> <https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21168086/508cd196-c17f-11e6-8a7e-56a8eb2cd575.PNG>
>>>>> is credited for "Recording many samples". Credit to Tilsch first appears
>>>>> in
>>>>> version 0.09. This strongly suggests that the majority of LMMS's sample
>>>>> library *is *properly licensed. Many of the samples are acoustic, or
>>>>> appear to have been sampled from a drum machine. (I have yet to see Roland
>>>>> go after people for recording the TR-808). There are a few sample of
>>>>> unknown origin
>>>>> <https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/20342439/21168084/5086141e-c17f-11e6-8a66-694b18b32167.PNG>,
>>>>> but in the first release of LMMS (0.01) Tobydox credits a sound website (
>>>>> sound.condorow.net). This site appears to no longer be in existence,
>>>>> but site data <http://www.searchtagslist.com/www/sound.condorow.net>
>>>>> seems to indicate it would offer open-licensed samples. I find this to be
>>>>> rather conclusive evidence that the native sample library offers nothing
>>>>> to
>>>>> worry about in terms of licensing. Hope you like this find, and have nice
>>>>> day
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>>>>> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
