>
> I don't know, but it seems like this mailing list can get hostile at some
> point
Okay, granted my sarcasm was unwarranted (apologies tresf), but I do feel
that this an important find. Given the circumstances though, it is no
longer worth discussing in this context.
Peace.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The licensing conversations have been covered many times on the samples
> library repository.
>
> https://github.com/LMMS/samples/issues/15
>
> Statements like this don't help:
>
> > This strongly suggests that the majority of LMMS's sample library *is
> > *properly
>> licensed
>
>
> As there's no definition of what "proper" is.
>
> Moving forward, all samples presets and projects should be CC0. "CC0" is
> proper and the OP knows that. Anything else is a waste of time to even
> talk about as it takes liberties away from the composer and adds vagueness
> which will only end up with more questions and more really bad speculative
> answers.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
