On 05/15/2013 08:29 PM, Florian Jung wrote:
> ok so we all agree that we want to move to one of {github, bitbucket}
> and {git,mercurial}.
>
> just, which of the three combinations (git,github), (git, bitbucket) and
> (mercurial, bitbucket) do we want?
>
> github is free-of-charge for open-source projects. bitbucket is even
> more free-of-charge, because it also allows "small" closed-source projects.
>
> but as this is not a problem for us, and because bitbucket seems to be a
> not-so-good plagiate of github, i'd vote against (git, bitbucket).
>
>
> So do we want to use git (and github) or mercurial (and bitbucket) then?
>
> i have used both systems a bit, but not much (only locally, committing
> and a tiny bit of branching), and have seen no real difference.
>
> vote!
>
> greetings,
> flo
>as a simple dumb-arsed user I find github no problem at all, so it gets my vote as a repo at least. easy to use from my pov and works fine. best g ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d _______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
