push If nobody calls "stop", I'll take your silence as a lack of reasons for this additional layer.
Please tell me whether there is a reason, or tell me "no, go ahead". Thank you. Am 26.06.2013 23:56, schrieb Florian Jung: > Hi > > is there any reason for Event wrapping around EventBase? There seems to > be some refcounting mechanism, too, and complicated stuff > > Why don't we just specify a fully abstract class (Java programmers call > it "interface"), and let WaveEvent and MidiEvent derive from this, and > we're done? > No EventBase pointers to be passed around or stuff. > > If there's no reason for this layer of indirection, i'd be glad to > remove it. > > Greetings, > flo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
