Hi Chris, 2017-12-31 11:54 GMT+01:00 kit <therealkit...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, > > this is not so much a Muse problem but one I thought about a bit. > > After an absence I built the v3.0.3 version of zynaddsubfx from git. It > builds the binary, native VST and LV2 versions. > > My question really is - does LV2 or VST or the binary perform better from > a resource aspect in Muse or in any DAW? > > The only downside I can determine is that a binary version of a soft synth > (say zynaddsubfx) can not be saved with the Muse project since it is > brought in via the external audio. > > So given the choice the of the 3 formats (LV2, VST or binary), which would > be the optimal one to use? > I've had some trouble using the VST and LV2 version in MusE, crashes during song loading etc, might be my build of them... if they work fine for you I definitely think you should use one of the plugin versions. For me atleast it makes a world of difference to only have to load the song and not having to remember all the connections, patches, levels or whatever. Performance wise I cannot really say, Zynaddsubfx was not built to be used as a plugin so it might be that it works best standalone but I would still use the VST or LV2 version as long as there was no breaking problem. > > And Happy New Year to all. > The same to you :) Regards, Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Lmuse-user mailing list Lmuse-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user
