Otherwise OK, but shouldn't remove the timer example. Why it's a bad example? I think we need a set of simple examples. It would also demonstrate how to step out from a schedule loop (== pause -> schedule until ODP_BUFFER_INVALID is returned -> tear down / step out).
The new timer example could be more performance oriented, etc. -Petri > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:lng-odp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Mike Holmes > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 8:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH 0/3] Remove odp_schedule_one for 1.0 compliance > > The 1.0 API delta doc specifies that odp_schedule_one should be removed. > This series does that. In doing so it is expedient to just delete the > timer > example because it is a poor example and there are patches under > consideration > that improve the timer implementation and replace this bad example. > > Mike Holmes (3): > example: odp_example: remove use of odp_schdule_one > example: odp_timer_test: delete bad example > api: schedule: remove odp_schedule_one > > example/Makefile.am | 2 +- > example/odp_example/odp_example.c | 140 -------- > example/timer/.gitignore | 1 - > example/timer/Makefile.am | 7 - > example/timer/odp_timer_test.c | 389 ----------------- > ----- > platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_schedule.h | 25 -- > platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule.c | 12 - > 7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 575 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 example/timer/.gitignore > delete mode 100644 example/timer/Makefile.am > delete mode 100644 example/timer/odp_timer_test.c > > -- > 2.1.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
