On 12/18/2014 08:05 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I'm not sure if we have an official process (yet), but that's what
I've been doing. Comments, Mike?
I think we don't need to open bugs for already fixed things. What is the
reason for that?
Maxim.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Taras Kondratiuk
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 12/18/2014 01:42 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
This looks good. As a practice, for patch revisions
post-merge I think
these should be tracked as bugs that are being fixed, and the
patch
comments should note what bug it's addressing.
Is it our 'official' approach?
Should I create bugs on bugs.linaro.org <http://bugs.linaro.org>
by myself in this case?
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
