Yes. Actually it's a bug against 0.5.0, but we can pick it up as part of 0.6.0. Shows how often that test is actually run. :)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > > We should add this to 0.6.0 I think - comments ? > > On 19 December 2014 at 15:20, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> >> --- >> Test was not properly updated to run with new buffer pool structure. Added >> an explicit buffer number. >> >> example/timer/odp_timer_test.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c >> b/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c >> index 0d6e31a..c754695 100644 >> --- a/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c >> +++ b/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c >> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ >> >> #define MAX_WORKERS 32 /**< Max worker threads */ >> #define MSG_POOL_SIZE (4*1024*1024) /**< Message pool size */ >> +#define MSG_NUM_BUFS 10000 /**< Number of timers */ >> >> >> /** Test arguments */ >> @@ -316,7 +317,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) >> >> params.buf_size = 0; >> params.buf_align = 0; >> - params.num_bufs = MSG_POOL_SIZE; >> + params.num_bufs = MSG_NUM_BUFS; >> params.buf_type = ODP_BUFFER_TYPE_TIMEOUT; >> >> pool = odp_buffer_pool_create("msg_pool", shm, ¶ms); >> -- >> 1.8.3.2 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> > > > > -- > *Mike Holmes* > Linaro Sr Technical Manager > LNG - ODP >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
