On 01/16/2015 05:39 PM, Ola Dahl wrote:
> I am wondering why odp_buffer_t is still around, when it is supposed to
> be replaced by odp_event_t?

It is for ODP_EVENT_BUFFER (previously ODP_BUFFER_TYPE_RAW) type of
odp_event_t.

-- 
Taras Kondratiuk

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to