On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 06:05:55PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >On 01/21/2015 05:13 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >>The norm is to include at least a summary of the changes from the >>previous version, but if that's too much effort then a simple >>changelog entry like >> >> * New upstream release >> >>will suffice. As an example, I've just pointed Anders at >> >> >> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/j/jigit/unstable_changelog >> >>which is the changelog for jigit, a package I maintain both upstream >>and in Debian. The changes listed are summarised from the upstream >>VCS logs to reduce verbosity. > >Who will maintain that change log? And can we get rid of that change >log from main repo?
I'd argue that over time we should be keeping a summary changelog anyway, something that will be trivially includable in the debian/changelog file before we release. We should be doing this for end users who are not tracking us via git... Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre [email protected] <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
