These rules seem excessively nit-picky. Why are we adding more buckles on the the straightjacket? What actual bugs did the previous checkpatch allow through?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > CI has found a lot more to complain about in the current code base with > the new checkpatch > > New results > https://ci.linaro.org/job/odp-api-style-check/label=build/440/console > > I am not suggesting we go back and change it, as new code is added it will > slowly clean up naturally, but the effect of the tighter rules can be seen. > > Previous rules here > https://ci.linaro.org/job/odp-api-style-check/label=build/439/console > > On 14 May 2015 at 07:58, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Merged! >> >> Maxim. >> >> On 05/13/2015 13:49, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >> >>> Update checkpatch. Add our local fixes. Plus fix lenght limit for log >>> functions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Maxim. >>> >>> Maxim Uvarov (2): >>> checkpatch: update to linux 4.1 rc-3 >>> checkpatch: remove cunit warnings >>> >>> Taras Kondratiuk (1): >>> checkpatch: remove line length limit for odp log functions >>> >>> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2513 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 2183 insertions(+), 330 deletions(-) >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> > > > > -- > Mike Holmes > Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group > Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs > > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
