Merged,
Maxim.

On 06/02/15 20:44, Mike Holmes wrote:
I dont have any objections.

On 2 June 2015 at 11:19, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Patch looks good. Mike I think you don't have objections to apply
    it, right?

    Maxim.


    On 05/28/15 09:24, Jerin Jacob wrote:

        On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 07:38:26AM -0400, Mike Holmes wrote:

            On 27 May 2015 at 00:17, Jacob, Jerin
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            wrote:

                Not completely understood your concern.If you are
                concerned about the
                coverage of "odp_queue_sched_type" API
                then odp_queue unit can be extended to create schedule
                type queue and add
                "odp_queue_sched_type" API  coverage.
                But in any case, We should remove the
                odp_queue_sched_type() call on
                pooled queues.

            My thought was that we have very poor sunny day coverage,
            and we should
            extend that and ensure such cases are accurate as you
            propose. But in
            addition calling the API in other combinations actually
            helps define the
            APIs behavior. In this case the current test is not
            correct but may add
            value the the testing ?

            I have not looked in detail - just asking if there was
            merit to keeping a
            copy of this as a "bad" test.

        IMO, No merit in keeping the bad test.




                From: Mike Holmes <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>>
                Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 8:14 PM
                To: Jacob, Jerin
                Cc: lng-odp
                Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: queue:
                schedule parameters are
                not valid for poll type queue


                If this is not a valid sunny day test, should we
                rename it and retain it
                as a valid test case for  passing an non valid params ?


                On 22 May 2015 at 07:43, Jerin Jacob
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>>
                wrote:
                  Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob
                <[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>>
                ---
                  test/validation/odp_queue.c | 8 +-------
                  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

                diff --git a/test/validation/odp_queue.c
                b/test/validation/odp_queue.c
                index 5123939..01a704c 100644
                --- a/test/validation/odp_queue.c
                +++ b/test/validation/odp_queue.c
                @@ -45,24 +45,18 @@ static void
                test_odp_queue_sunnyday(void)
                         odp_buffer_t buf;
                         odp_event_t ev;
                         odp_pool_t msg_pool;
                -       odp_queue_param_t param;
                         odp_event_t *pev_tmp;
                         int i, deq_ret, ret;
                         int nr_deq_entries = 0;
                         int max_iteration = CONFIG_MAX_ITERATION;
                         void *prtn = NULL;

                -       memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
                -       param.sched.sync  = ODP_SCHED_SYNC_NONE;
                -
                         queue_creat_id = odp_queue_create("test_queue",
                -  ODP_QUEUE_TYPE_POLL, &param);
                +  ODP_QUEUE_TYPE_POLL, NULL);
                         CU_ASSERT(ODP_QUEUE_INVALID != queue_creat_id);

                         CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(ODP_QUEUE_TYPE_POLL,
                 odp_queue_type(queue_creat_id));
                -       CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(ODP_SCHED_SYNC_NONE,
                -  odp_queue_sched_type(queue_creat_id));

                         queue_id = odp_queue_lookup("test_queue");
                         CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(queue_creat_id, queue_id);
                --
                2.1.0

                _______________________________________________
                lng-odp mailing list
                [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp




                  --





                Mike Holmes
                Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
                Linaro.org │ Open  source software for ARM SoCs







-- Mike Holmes
            Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
            Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source
            software for ARM SoCs

        _______________________________________________
        lng-odp mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp





--
Mike Holmes
Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>***│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs


_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to