On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:17:34PM +0200, Christophe Milard wrote: > I have just reviewed the all series. As a side note though, I thing a MACRO > called ODP_TEST_OVERLOAD(test_func, new_test_func) should be defined if a > given test function should be "replaced") using the update function. The > TEST_INFO macro would not be able to be used as, for this macro, the name > of the test matches the name of the function and functions cannot be > overloaded in C. > I think that could be done in another patch, though. (hence my reviews) > > Do you agree Stuart? >
Replacing test functions can be done but it's a bit ugly as there's no macro for doing it - see end of this mail - https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/lng-odp/2015-September/015506.html I don't really have any objection to adding one but it can be done later, nobody needs it right now. -- Stuart. _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
