Just read the discussion in other thread. Seems reasonable For the series: Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan <[email protected]> Regards, Bala
On 25 January 2016 at 10:56, Bala Manoharan <[email protected]> wrote: > Just curious does this issue not happen in production build? > > Regards, > Bala > > > On 5 November 2015 at 23:32, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> >> --- >> platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c >> b/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c >> index 76a4aa5..9fd64d6 100644 >> --- a/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c >> +++ b/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c >> @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ void odp_buffer_free(odp_buffer_t buf) >> odp_buffer_hdr_t *buf_hdr = odp_buf_to_hdr(buf); >> pool_entry_t *pool = odp_buf_to_pool(buf_hdr); >> >> + ODP_ASSERT(buf_hdr->allocator != ODP_FREEBUF); >> + >> if (odp_unlikely(pool->s.low_wm_assert)) >> ret_buf(&pool->s, buf_hdr); >> else >> -- >> 2.1.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
