Merged,
Maxim.
On 01/25/2016 08:34, Bala Manoharan wrote:
Just read the discussion in other thread. Seems reasonable
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan <[email protected]>
Regards,
Bala
On 25 January 2016 at 10:56, Bala Manoharan <[email protected]> wrote:
Just curious does this issue not happen in production build?
Regards,
Bala
On 5 November 2015 at 23:32, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <[email protected]>
---
platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c
b/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c
index 76a4aa5..9fd64d6 100644
--- a/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c
+++ b/platform/linux-generic/odp_pool.c
@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ void odp_buffer_free(odp_buffer_t buf)
odp_buffer_hdr_t *buf_hdr = odp_buf_to_hdr(buf);
pool_entry_t *pool = odp_buf_to_pool(buf_hdr);
+ ODP_ASSERT(buf_hdr->allocator != ODP_FREEBUF);
+
if (odp_unlikely(pool->s.low_wm_assert))
ret_buf(&pool->s, buf_hdr);
else
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
