> > +=== Known Issues > > + > > +==== https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2765[Bug 2765] > > +The fixed storage overhead for supporting the new pool structures is > large > > +(over a quarter of a gigabyte). This may have an impact on smaller > systems. > > + > > > I think we need merge this patch before release. Patch itself is > reasonable and I think it can to go. But it will be good to get Petris > feedback on answer on his comment. > > Maxim.
What feedback you'd need? >From API point of view only difference should be ipsec.h. Currently 'next' is >missing couple of name length modifications from 'api-next' (api: unify >ODP_*_NAME_LEN specifications, api: move ODP_*_NAME_LEN definitions from API >to implementation). Those should be trivial additions to 'next' and would make >the release more consistent (as all name lengths would be defined the same >way). After that merge, we should be ready for the release. E.g. the above bug (large storage overhead) is not blocking since it matter only small systems and a user can work around it by using smaller pool defines in config.h. I'd like to see release happening sooner than later, so that the (unnecessary) large gap closes between api-next and master. -Petri
