So, this patch is now in the repo. I don't see *anybody* as a reviewer in the 
git log. I did NACK it the qentry_from_int(queue_from_ext(handle)) clutter it 
brings in the code base (for no real reason). That would have been an easy fix. 
What did override our discipline of merging code ?

-Petri
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lng-odp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> GitHub
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 5:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [lng-odp] [Linaro/odp] 8b30e2: linux-generic: queue: modular
> queue interface
> 
>   Branch: refs/heads/api-next
>   Home:   https://github.com/Linaro/odp
>   Commit: 8b30e228ba2c303b3c69ffa4fbb9f138d2523d9a
> 
> https://github.com/Linaro/odp/commit/8b30e228ba2c303b3c69ffa4fbb9f138d2523
> d9a
>   Author: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>
>   Date:   2017-06-07 (Wed, 07 Jun 2017)
> 
>   Changed paths:
>     M platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am
>     M platform/linux-generic/include/odp_classification_datamodel.h
>     M platform/linux-generic/include/odp_packet_io_queue.h
>     A platform/linux-generic/include/odp_queue_if.h
>     M platform/linux-generic/include/odp_queue_internal.h
>     M platform/linux-generic/include/odp_schedule_if.h
>     M platform/linux-generic/include/odp_traffic_mngr_internal.h
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_classification.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_init.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_packet_io.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_queue.c
>     A platform/linux-generic/odp_queue_if.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule_iquery.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule_sp.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/odp_traffic_mngr.c
>     M platform/linux-generic/pktio/loop.c
> 
>   Log Message:
>   -----------
>   linux-generic: queue: modular queue interface
> 
> Created abstract queue type. Queue APIs and functions towards the
> internal components are converted into function pointers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>
> 

Reply via email to