Hi, I think there is a need to identify tools and specific versions of the tools from patch acceptance perspective. Any failures outside of these versions should be the responsibility of the person facing the issues, they should submit a patch for those versions and tools.
Travis CI is a step in that direction. But I think we still allow submissions of patches via email. So, for this case, should we standardize the tools and versions being used in Travis CI as the acceptance criteria? Thanks, Honnappa
