Along with this, we need to standardize 32b/64b compilations and the platforms on which we run the test cases. Thanks, Honnappa
On 21 June 2017 at 11:38, Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I think there is a need to identify tools and specific versions of > the tools from patch acceptance perspective. Any failures outside of > these versions should be the responsibility of the person facing the > issues, they should submit a patch for those versions and tools. > > Travis CI is a step in that direction. But I think we still allow > submissions of patches via email. So, for this case, should we > standardize the tools and versions being used in Travis CI as the > acceptance criteria? > > Thanks, > Honnappa
