On 10/12/2018 22:11, Bill Fischofer wrote: > I assume that's an API change? Can you put together a draft PR of what > what would look like that we can discuss?
I can sketch a draft PR, however I'd like to hear an opinion first. Basically my suggestion is to move digest from packet data to odp_comp_packet_result_t. This will result in extra API call being necessary to access digest data. > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:00 PM Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > <dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org > <mailto:dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been reworking compression API implementation to properly > allocate/deallocate memory. Right now I've stumbled upon digest part of > compression API. Currently on both compression and decompression digest > should be written after co/decompressed output data. However both our > hardware and current DPDK compressdev use out-of-band data to pass > resulting hash. Do we want to stick with in-package data or do we want > to switch to OOB way to return message digest? > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry > -- With best wishes Dmitry