Aaron Toponce wrote: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/<Full_state_name>Team > eg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UtahTeam > http://www.launchpad.net/~<full_state_name>team > eg: http://www.launchpad.net/~utahteam > http://www.ubuntu-<full_state_name>.[org|com|net] > eg: http://www.ubuntu-utah.org > http://ubuntu-<full_state_name>.ubuntuforums.org > eg: http://ubuntu-utah.ubuntuforums.org > irc://irc.ubuntu.com/#ubuntu-<full_state_name> > eg: irc://irc.ubuntu.com/#ubuntu-utah > Colorado is currently in alignment with those except forums (we don't have any) and website (ubuntu-rocks.org). Chicago, however, is consistent with the regular LoCo naming. I recommended this in passing to Rich and we was able to do it. That means that at least our two groups are out of compliance with the larger folks which are "ubuntu-<two letter country code>".
So, that's part of the issue right...at least Utah and Colorado did similar things (truth be told, I based Colorado off of Utah due to the problems in securing Ubuntu resources at the time). I'd like to see Jono's proposal/desire. We can ask him to help push all the requests through if it requires modifying distribution lists, web locations, etc..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
