On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone disagree with coming to the conclusion that we need to > make sure a LoCo focuses on a whole state and not just one city in a > state? -- I thought that was in the definition of a LoCo, but I could > just be a liberal judge ;)
I agree that LoCos should work to encourage and promote events throughout their country. This means sharing team resources, making sure everyone is notified of upcoming events and projects, and in general encouraging individuals in their areas to do LoCo stuff where they live (an installfest may be tricky, but it only takes one person to put some Ubuntu CDs in their local library!). However, I wouldn't berate teams who are generally much more active in cities. There are more people in cities, more people can take on more ambitious projects, and these anchor city teams will always exist. Folks in cities cannot MAKE people in less populated areas do events and be active, the people who live there have to do that, all the city folks can do is to encourage them and be supportive when they do. -- Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2 http://www.princessleia.com -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
