On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:13 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'd think this issue would hit close to home -- California had some > rough times regarding not focusing on the whole state a while back.
I wouldn't categorize the California Team issues as being trouble with not focusing on the whole state, and those issues would not be addressed by what is being proposed here. > Does anyone disagree with coming to the conclusion that we need to > make sure a LoCo focuses on a whole state and not just one city in a > state? -- I thought that was in the definition of a LoCo, but I could > just be a liberal judge ;) I don't think anyone disagrees with that but I still think documentation is the way to go here. Certainly we don't need a policy guideline for that. -- Nathan Haines <[email protected]> Ubuntu California Local Community Team -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
