On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:02:42PM -0600, Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Bob Rossi wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 07:35:51AM -0800, Gump Integration Build > >wrote: > >>To whom it may engage... > > > >I'm not sure if you care, but the Emails that you are sending to this > >list annoy me, and may very well annoy others. It's possible you could > >get better responses by sending simple text emails describing your > >problems. I for one would actually read the emails and consider > >responding to them. > > > >Please don't take this as an opportunity to debate the content of the > >Emails. I'm simply giving this as my personal opinion, others may feel > >differently. > > > >Bob Rossi > > > Those messages are automatically generated by Gump when the nightly > build fails for any reason. In this case, the nightly build is > broken due to a change in the cpptasks plugin for Ant which had a > breaking change a week or so ago. I could turn off the nags from > Gump (since as an Apache committer I can tweak Gump) or I could > figure out why cpptasks is still failing after it looked like the > developer had reverted his breaking change (since I'm a committer > there too).
Do you think a separate mailing list would be appropriate for this? I enjoy staying on the list to ask questions or help others. I don't enjoy seeing the status of the nightly builds. I suppose I could filter it out myself somehow ... Thanks, Bob Rossi
