Sorry to have been vague in my intent... I feel the log4cxx-supported Windows build system(s) should be at least the APR-supported Windows build system(s). Hence looking at APR for inspiration and maybe a public list of supported stuff that we could use.
> I don't think I get the idea behind this (again). Do you mean Ant as > prerequisite for APR? No, I mentioned it only because we've discussed Ant in the past and there's considerable Anty-ness in place already. > What would be the benefit of knowing which platforms APR can > support on Windows and maybe Log4cxx doesn't right now for any reason? Because our dependencies are pretty much exactly APR. If APR can build, log4cxx should build. > I think the main problem for Windows will be cpptasks and build.xml, > APR works fine for example on current versions of C++ Builder, but > cpptasks don't. So, respectfully, consider fixing cpptasks for your version of C++ Builder. - Rhys
