Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
am Samstag, 23. Juli 2016 um 22:15 schrieben Sie:

> Given my quick test, it seems like using CMake for Windows is a
> valid solution for building log4cxx, especially since the only
> dependencies for log4cxx also use CMake.  Thoughts?

Sounds good to me. How to build was discussed before with a favour for
CMake, because the current one is based on ANT and uses CppTasks,
which still works, but is not maintained anymore. And as both
solutions don't support my used compiler at all...

But from my point of view, that switch should be done in a branch for
another release and the next one should be done with how it is build
currently. I guess most users don't use Windows anyway.

So, how about the formality of the release process of incubating
projects itself? Are you able and willing to have a look into that?

From the last time I had a look I know that there's some PGP signing
stuff that needs to be done and I currently don't have any PGP keys or
am associated with any Apache key for their Web of trust.

Additionally, I don't have a clue currently how exactly the files to
be released are build and packaged using Maven. There's some release
plugin and it should do most of the work, but I didn't try yet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning       E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme      http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...........05151-  9468- 55
Fax...............05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow

Reply via email to