That would seem to be the more "politic" way to go...
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Glezen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:05 AM
To: LOG4J Developers Mailing List
Subject: Log4j support for JDK 1.1
I like the idea of designating a last release that officially supports JDK
1.1. But it doesn't have to be a previous release. For example, Ceki's
release plan for log4j 1.2 could include the JDK 1.2 requirement. We could
keep compatibility throughout the minor releases of log4j 1.1 and then let
go of JDK 1.1 in log4j 1.2.
- Paul
Paul Glezen
IT Specialist
Software Services
818 539 3321
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
