Is there an ant target for building the docs?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:52 AM
To: LOG4J Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [POLL] Documentation in Docbook
Paul,
I checked in my very early draft. It contains a primitive TOC. Feel free to
comment/enhance. Regards, Ceki
At 17:34 05.09.2001 -0700, Paul Glezen wrote:
>If we're going to make a book out of this, perhaps we should concentrate on
>a table of contents first. Then we could parcel out pieces of it from
>that. It seems like the work we would have ahead of us to begin with is
>
>1. table of contents
>2. some kind of style guide to make the sections consistent
>3. pick up Docbook as we go along
>
>Paul Glezen
>IT Specialist
>Software Services for WebSphere
>818 539 3321
>
>
>Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/05/2001 02:32:37 PM
>
>Please respond to "LOG4J Developers Mailing List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc:
>Subject: [POLL] Documentation in Docbook
>
>
>
>
>Hello all,
>
>I have started migrating log4j documentation to Docbook. Many Linux
>documents
>are written using DocBook which can export to many different formats
>including
>html, tex, rtf, pdf and ps. I am not a Docbook expert but it seemed
>reasonably
>easy to learn particularly given that it is such a powerful tool.
>
>Does anyone object or has better ideas? Thanks, Ceki
>
>
>--
>Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
