At 12:39 14.01.2002 -0800, Mark Womack wrote:
>Also, do you think it is possible to add the doConfigure(InputStream) method
>to the Configurator interface?  Would you consider that method "common" to
>all configurators?  If I can assume the interface has this method, then I
>would not need to use reflection to find it.  Just a thought.  I know you
>want to keep the Configurator interface as simple and lean as possible, but
>it seems to me that an InputStream is about as common as one can get.

Adding the doConfigure(InputStream) is easy. However, do
you really need it? Please answer by just yes or no as I would like to
discover the reason for myself by studying your code once
again. (I don't see the reason for the moment.) Cheers, Ceki



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to