Thanks for your answers, Ceki. Here are my follow-up questions - I hope you can answer them too.
>>* Is the above mentioned "Domino Log4j Package" ok with the Apache license? >>* Is it ok to use log4j as part of the name? The license says no, if I don´t >>have permission. >No, you cannot use log4j as part of the name, just as the license >says. We are serious about enforcing this rule. I will rename the package. >>* Can the log4j jar be packaged with this "Domino package"? >You can package log4j.jar as long as you respect the terms of >the license. Thank you. >>* Do I have to release this "package" under the Apache license, or is it >>possible to use the GNU General Public License? >I am afraid that the Apache Software Foundation can only accept >contributions under the Apache Software License. Is it ok to release source / binary code under the Apache Software License, even if I am not a member of the Apache "team"? >>* Is the namespace that I have used (net.kanngard.util.logging etc...) ok, >>or is it better with org.apache.log4j etc? >It depends on what you want to do. I want to release the DominoAppender and DominoConfigurator (and more...) to the open source community. As part of the "contribution" part in log4j, if you want. The "package" i´m talking about, is just a simple way for Domino developers to implement log4j and my additions. - Johan ____________________ Johan Känngård [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
