>In early 2002, a user (I can't find the name since Bugzilla is down) >filed a bug report claiming that on a heavily used server machine >adding buffered IO to FileAppender gave a perceptible boost to logging >performance. As a response we added buffered IO to FileAppender.
Perhaps you are referring to my message which was about the size of buffering. In some environments varying buffersize can help (try 64 bytes vs. 8KB or 64KB). There is also a bugzilla ref to someone elses experience with async logging... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=99771529009797&w=2 Wolfgang. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
