FYI, here are somewhat related papers of performance-oriented colleagues: Dynamic Monitoring of High-Performance Distributed Applications, D. Gunter, B. Tierney, K. Jackson, J. Lee, M. Stoufer, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC-11, July 2002, http://www-didc.lbl.gov/papers/HPDC02-HP-monitoring.pdf
Monitoring Data Archives for Grid Environments, J. Lee, D. Gunter, M. Stoufer, B. Tierney, Proceeding of IEEE Supercomputing 2002 Conference, Nov. 2002 http://www-didc.lbl.gov/papers/Monitoring-archive-SC02-extended-abstract.pdf Wolfgang. At 15:49 24/6/2002 +0200, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: >>In early 2002, a user (I can't find the name since Bugzilla is down) >>filed a bug report claiming that on a heavily used server machine >>adding buffered IO to FileAppender gave a perceptible boost to logging >>performance. As a response we added buffered IO to FileAppender. > >Perhaps you are referring to my message which was about the size of buffering. >In some environments varying buffersize can help (try 64 bytes vs. 8KB or >64KB). >There is also a bugzilla ref to someone elses experience with async logging... > >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=99771529009797&w=2 > >Wolfgang. > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Hoschek | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CERN IT Division | phone: +41 (22) 767 8089 European Organization | fax: +41 (22) 767 7155 for Nuclear Research | home: http://cern.ch/hoschek ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>