Pricilla,
You need to describe your environment. The ignoreTCL property will solve most cases of "multiple log4j.jar" syndrome but there are cases which it won't solve. What it is the *exact* error message? At 22:49 25.09.2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Pricilla, > >I think your message is more appropriate for the log4j-user email list. But >the log4j.tcl property was just added recently by Ceki, so I think he can >answer the question best. Generally though, you do not want log4j available >within 2 different locations in your classpath. Try having only one >instance in your classpath and see if the problem still occurs. > >hth, >-Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pricilla Yin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:19 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: log4j.ignoreTCL > > > > > > I tried to set this system property to get around the error ""appender > > is not assignable to Appender" when log4j.jar is loaded by mutliple > > class loaders. > > > > However, it didn't work. I included the following line in the properties > > file > > > > log4j.ignoreTCL = true > > > > I tried to set the property using the java -Dlog4j.ignoreTCL=true. It > > still > > complained the error. > > > > What did I do wrong? > > > > Pricilla > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Ceki TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
