DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229 Convenience methods to cut object allocations in application code [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Convenience methods to cut |Convenience methods to cut |execution speed in |object allocations in |application code |application code ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-18 21:33 ------- Hello Matt! I don't see the point of your checkedDebug() method. It does exactly the same thing as the debug()-method except that same tests are run twice (if enabled). Your suggestion is that I create a concatenation object instead of creating the StringBuffer. If I take some liberty with your suggestion this will look like this in my application (example from Jake): logger.debug(new Concatenator("some string", somevar, "another string", anothervar)); I considered this solution but I have two things against it. Firstly, this means that somewhere in my code I will have this utility class or more likely it will be implemented differently in several different parts of my code by different developers and some will forget about it. Secondly, this suggestion results in the creation of the Concatenator object wether debugging is on or off. It is better than the creation of StringBuffer+String but not good enough. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
