DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229 Convenience methods to cut object allocations in application code ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-23 09:13 ------- Hi, Just a short remark about this discussion: although I completely agree with the comments of Jacob Kjome on 2003-01-18 00:15 and Linus Tolke on 2003-01-18 20:43 about multiple buffer and concatenation when writing something like logger.debug("some string" + somevar + "another string" + anothervar); I think the whole point of the proposition of Linus is to replace this call by logger.debug("some string" , somevar , "another string" , anothervar); (i.e. using comas instead of '+'). Otherwise, the proposed extension is NOT used! I think this kind of call is clean and easy to write (easier than the 'concatenator' one). And the implementation is short and straigthforward too. The only drawback I see (and this is also true with the concatenator option) is that all the parameters must be Object, so no int, boolean,... cheers... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
