I moved them with the thinking that they were "unproven". While filters and filter chains are well established in log4j, the base GenericMatchFilter design that was worked out might need to be "shaken" out a bit. That was the only thinking. We can move them back now or "graduate" them back into the core at a later time.
I would really like to see the sandbox stuff released prior to v1.3. This will give the classes earlier exposure, and hopefully get some useful feedback. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:03 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-log4j/tests/witness > filters.LevelMatchFilter.test4.txt filters.LevelMatchFilter.test3.txt > filters.LevelMatchFilter.test2.txt filters.LevelMatchFilter.test1.txt > > > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the getting the sandbox initiative rolling. > However, why are you > moving the filters? They were just fine in log4j proper, no? > > At 06:52 04.02.2003 +0000, you wrote: > >mwomack 2003/02/03 22:52:24 > > > > Removed: tests/witness filters.LevelMatchFilter.test4.txt > > filters.LevelMatchFilter.test3.txt > > filters.LevelMatchFilter.test2.txt > > filters.LevelMatchFilter.test1.txt > > Log: > > Removed. Moved to log4j-sandbox. > > -- > Ceki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
