> I will cede to not releasing log4j-sandbox if it going to be really > complicated. But I feel very strongly that it will be a > mistake and the > initiative will be lost. I look back to the amount of > feedback I received > when I released built versions of the watchdog code I was > working on, before > becoming a committer. If that code was just sitting in a cvs > repository > somewhere, with no real release support, the amount of > feedback would have > been zero instead of the small number of comments I received. > I have no > illusions on this point. It is hard enough trying to get feedback on > initiatives that are part of log4j core.
BTW, I would like us to have an explicit decision on this so we can move forward with full understanding. We might want to draw up some kind of document that describes the purpose and process of the log4j-sandbox stuff. Doesn't have to be a complicated UN resolution or anything, but something that communicates what we have decided and informs the general log4j community. -Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
