FYI. Currently log4net only supports an XML config file. Also it is not 100% compatible with the log4j config file. Some of this is due to different terminology (e.g. using the attribute 'type' rather than 'class' to specify the dynamically loaded object types), and some due to architectural differences.
Nicko > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Bair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 February 2003 17:37 > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Configuration GUI & logging.apache.org > > > Hey folks, > > While working on a prelim version of the configuration gui we > noticed a > couple of things with respect to log4j/log4perl/c++ etc > > 1) Apparently log4perl and others support the property style config > files, but not xml > 2) in log4j the properties start like 'log4j.rootlogger', whereas perl > is like 'log4perl.rootlogger'. > > We haven't exhaustively checked this out everywhere. I'd > like to see in > a logging.apache style project that we standardize on a config file > format (xml is more flexible, is it not?), and also, can we change > log4j.* and log4perl.* to log.*? > > I suppose there's no hope of supporting log.* in this release. > > Thoughts? > Richard > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
