This may not be a good fit for log4* projects for a number of reasons (too 
heavyweight, etc).
But consider that if the configuration file is xml with a known schema (or dtd, etc), 
then the
individual implementations could use XSLT to produce a configuration file of their own 
specific formats at runtime.  Think of it as a sort of "pre-processing" stage.

This might be an easy way to have a unified common config file format with minimal 
changes to each implementation.

Sean Reilly
Software Architect, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:49 AM
> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Configuration GUI & logging.apache.org
> 
> 
> FYI. Currently log4net only supports an XML config file. Also 
> it is not 100%
> compatible with the log4j config file. Some of this is due to 
> different
> terminology (e.g. using the attribute 'type' rather than 
> 'class' to specify
> the dynamically loaded object types), and some due to architectural
> differences.
> 
> Nicko
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Bair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 18 February 2003 17:37
> > To: Log4J Developers List
> > Subject: Configuration GUI & logging.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> > Hey folks,
> > 
> > While working on a prelim version of the configuration gui we 
> > noticed a
> > couple of things with respect to log4j/log4perl/c++ etc
> > 
> > 1) Apparently log4perl and others support the property style config
> > files, but not xml
> > 2) in log4j the properties start like 'log4j.rootlogger', 
> whereas perl
> > is like 'log4perl.rootlogger'.
> > 
> > We haven't exhaustively checked this out everywhere.  I'd 
> > like to see in
> > a logging.apache style project that we standardize on a config file
> > format (xml is more flexible, is it not?), and also, can we change
> > log4j.* and log4perl.* to log.*?
> > 
> > I suppose there's no hope of supporting log.* in this release.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > Richard
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to