Howdy,
If there is some help needed with configuration of either jalopy or checkstyle, I'll 
be glad to help.  Sorry for contributing the original tasks to the log4j build.xml and 
then disappearing ;)  An unexpected moved up deadline at work.

To someone else's point: I've found that running checkstyle on an unformatted code 
base will result in a ton of errors, probably too many for the report to be 
meaningful.  However, more than 80% of these errors tend to be trivial for an 
automated formatter to fix, e.g. line too long or keyword order incorrect (final 
static instead of static final etc.).  So running a formatter on the entire codebase, 
just once, before running checkstyle, will remove around 80% of the errors.  
Alternatively, checkstyle can be configured to not check these things.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Oliver Burn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 8:49 PM
>To: Log4J Developers List
>Subject: RE: Applying Jalopy?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 05:48
>> To: Log4J Developers List
>> Subject: RE: Applying Jalopy?
>>
>>
>[snip]
>> I have also installed a checkstyle plugin into Eclipse, Unfortunately, I
>> get over 20'000 warnings over log4j source code which renders
>> the tool very
>> much impractical to use. Moreover, I do not see a problem with a large
>> number of the generated warnings. There are probably ways to
>> suppress some
>> of the warnings but I am not familiar enough with Checkstyle to
>> implement
>> the desired customization. To be brutally honest, for the time
>> being I am
>> much more comfortable with applying Jalopy per file or per batch
>> in lieu of
>> battling with gazillions of checkstyle errors. Anyway, I'll battle some
>> more to see if things improve.
>This is always a problem with using a tool like Checkstyle after the
>fact. My personal record is getting 100,000 errors on a project I
>was consulting to.
>
>One nice feature about the Eclipse Checkstyle plug-in is that you
>can tell it which packages to actually report on. This combined with
>the Eclipse filter functionality lets you control errors very
>nicely.
>
>Regards,
>Oliver
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to