Yoav,

I guess I live under a rock.  I was never that aware of Doug Lea's library,
though I was aware of the constructs.  But an argument for a
commons-concurrency library is that it would be a standard library that all
the jakarta projects could use, just like ORO or HttpClient.  So, I don't
think it would be useless, but I don't have time to create/push it in
commons either.

I think it is cool that they are going to add a concurrency library to the
Java core, but it is a bummer it will only be available in JDK 1.5.  A
commons-concurrency could help with that as well.

-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:32 AM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: RE: ReadWriterLock usage
> 
> 
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> >I'm surprised that
> >a concurrency library is not part of Commons.  Or maybe I just missed
> it?
> 
> Commons-concurrency would be fairly useless, considering the 
> excellence
> of Doug Lea's concurrency library (which has been around for 
> a long time
> and works on older JDKs as well).
> 
> Yoav Shapira
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential 
> business communication, and may contain information that is 
> confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is 
> intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, 
> and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by 
> anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, 
> please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer 
> system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to