At 04:43 PM 6/25/2003 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
For the PluginRegistry, it seems to me that the third condition is not. If that is true, then there is no gain in using this type of fancy lock.
I had meant to write "is not met" and not just "is not". The corrected version reads:
For the PluginRegistry, it seems to me that the third condition is not met. If that is true, then there is no gain in using this type of fancy lock.
Enjoy your vacations,
-Mark
-- Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual" ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
