On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jim Moore wrote: | While I agree not having TRACE built in is a significant deficiency in what | Log4j provides, Log4j DOES make it trivial to add and is addressed in the | FAQ. For your convenience, here's a direct link to the relevant section in | the FAQ: | http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/TraceLevel
As I also mentioned such approaches in the post, didn't you see that? That is not good enough. I don't want to make some stupid wrapper or whatnot - I can change the entire logging system instead then. I want to use a PROPER logging-tool, and I'm fed up with log4j not having Trace - the most needed logging level of them all except for debug. Commons logging .. | | Btw: This has been brought up many times on the log4j-user list (where | comments and questions like this should be posted), so a quick search of the | list archives would've pointed it out... I know. I just wanted to chime in.. And WITH all that noise, WHY NOT add it? It seems REALL REALLY silly to me. Endre - a long-time user of log4j. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
