A number of user expressed their desire to see the TRACE level added. However, please note that log4j domains (to be introduced in log4j 1.3) should provide a much better alternative to adding a TRACE level or any other level for that matter.
At 06:07 PM 10/29/2003 +0100, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
That is not good enough. I don't want to make some stupid wrapper or whatnot - I can change the entire logging system instead then. I want to use a PROPER logging-tool, and I'm fed up with log4j not having Trace - the most needed logging level of them all except for debug.
Commons logging ..
What about commons logging?
| | Btw: This has been brought up many times on the log4j-user list (where | comments and questions like this should be posted), so a quick search of the | list archives would've pointed it out...
I know. I just wanted to chime in..
And WITH all that noise, WHY NOT add it? It seems REALL REALLY silly to me.
Because we have a better alternative.
Endre - a long-time user of log4j.
and a log4j contributor.
-- Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
