Scott and I have been discussing this offline over the last couple of days. Perhaps we should forward our email thread.
this begs the question about whether Scott and I should keep our discussions online on the list, my only concern is that we are doing a decent amount of discussion, and I'm afraid we might drown out other threads on this list. What do people think? I would love everyone to participate in the discussions, but I also don't want to saturate people either. Paul On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 08:44, Ceki GÃlcà wrote: > With the changes I just comitted, I observe a slightly different behavior. > The hostname and application name get concatenated in the tabs, which is > nice. However, there are cases when I could imagine a developer wanting to > put all logging events in the same "application" tab regardless of host. > > So, one might want to organize tabs by host or application or both or none. > Could this be a user configurable option? > > At 12:40 PM 12/10/2003 -0800, Scott Deboy wrote: > >I think something's wrong Chainsaw's routing..I can't get the log4japp > >property to make a difference.. > > > >Time to look into it. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Scott Deboy > >Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:34 PM > >To: Log4J Developers List > >Subject: RE: chainsaw with multiple tabs... > > > > > >Sounds good..the only reason I added 'log4j' to the front of the property > >name was to scope the properties to log4j-generated, not application-generated. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
